Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 01:05

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
NASA Goddard Center-wide Email - NASA Watch
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
China fast tracks rare earth export licences for European companies - Financial Times
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Nemo harum distinctio cupiditate soluta nesciunt beatae harum.
Thank you.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
‘Wednesday’ Season 2’s Opening Scenes Introduce Us to Her Wild Summer - Gizmodo
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
What’s next?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Blood Pressure: How to Monitor It Accurately at Home, According to Doctors - Barron's
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Something Big Is Twisting Mercury’s Crust - Gizmodo
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Legion of 50 strong as Seahawks reveal Top 50 players in franchise history - Field Gulls
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Chiefs trivia: Your in-5 daily game, Friday edition - Arrowhead Pride